







Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, Gettr, Truth Social, Twitter
When people talk about power in Washington, they picture lobbyists, billionaires, or big corporations. But sometimes, the real manipulation doesn’t happen in smoke-filled rooms — it happens quietly through “nonprofits” that claim to speak for the people while funneling money into private hands. Few examples show this better than Stanley Greenberg, the longtime Democratic pollster — and husband of Connecticut Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro — whose nonprofit and for-profit networks blur the line between public service and personal gain.
A Marriage of Politics and Profit
Greenberg co-founded Democracy Corps in 1999 alongside strategist James Carville. On paper, it’s a 501(c)(4) nonprofit dedicated to “public opinion research” to help Democrats understand voters. In reality, it’s a small but powerful political messaging machine that almost always contracts its research work to Greenberg’s own for-profit polling firm, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research (GQRR).
Public records and watchdog reports show that Democracy Corps has funneled the majority of its expenses directly to GQRR, often for “focus groups” and “polling analysis.” In some years, nearly all of its budget has gone to the same company that Greenberg himself controls.
That’s not illegal — but it is a perfect example of the self-dealing and insider privilege that dominate the nonprofit world. When your “charity” pays your own company for services, it becomes less about serving the public and more about maintaining power under a halo of legitimacy.
How to Manufacture a Message
If you’ve ever wondered why so many Democratic talking points sound rehearsed — the same buzzwords repeated by anchors, politicians, and activists — look at the pipeline.
Democracy Corps commissions polling through GQRR. The “independent data” it produces then spreads across the media ecosystem: think tanks cite it, journalists quote it, and candidates repeat it. By the time it reaches voters, it feels like public opinion — but it started as engineered consensus.
Greenberg’s firm has worked for countless Democratic campaigns and international governments, building a reputation for “winning the narrative.” Through Democracy Corps, those same strategies enter the nonprofit sphere, shaping debates about immigration, climate, and gender policy — all under the guise of neutral social science.
When the same man who profits from the polling also defines what voters “believe,” you no longer have democracy — you have manufactured democracy.
Connecticut’s Power Couple
In Connecticut, Greenberg and Rep. Rosa DeLauro are considered a political dynasty. DeLauro, who represents New Haven and much of central Connecticut, has been in Congress since 1991 and chairs powerful committees that touch nearly every aspect of domestic spending. Greenberg, meanwhile, has built a global consulting business that influences everything from U.S. elections to European politics.
Together, they form what locals quietly call the “Greenberg-DeLauro Machine.” Their influence reaches deep into the nonprofit networks that dominate Connecticut politics — from union-backed organizations to progressive advocacy groups that receive millions in federal and state grants. Those nonprofits often rely on the same polling, messaging, or “research” frameworks that come from Democracy Corps and its affiliates. It’s a closed loop: the insiders fund the nonprofits, the nonprofits hire the insiders, and the public is told it’s all grassroots democracy.
The Hidden Money Trail
According to watchdog sources like Influence Watch and Capital Research Center, Democracy Corps reported $961,447 in revenue in one year (2014), with more than $848,740 spent on “research” and “focus groups.” The vast majority of that money went straight to Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research — his own company.
Even Democracy Corps’ treasurer has had ties to GQRR, raising questions about conflict of interest and independence.
Who funds Democracy Corps? Not ordinary citizens. Donors include major progressive funding arms like the New Venture Fund, Patriot Majority USA, and the Media Matters Action Network — large political nonprofits that operate as “dark money” hubs, often obscuring the original source of donations. Those same networks spend heavily to influence journalism, polling, and online content — including many of the stories that shape how voters in Connecticut perceive reality.
It’s Legal — But It’s Not Right
Defenders of the Greenberg-DeLauro model will argue that this kind of overlap is normal in Washington. Technically, they’re right.
The IRS allows nonprofits to contract with related companies if they pay “fair market value.” But what the public rarely sees is how these setups are used to launder influence.
When a nonprofit hires a related firm, it creates an aura of independence: a “research report” that seems objective, but was created by the same insider who stands to benefit from the political outcome. It’s an ethical gray zone that corrodes public trust — and Connecticut taxpayers have every right to ask why one political family gets to play both sides of the equation.
Why This Matters in 2025
At a time when ordinary Americans are struggling with inflation, housing shortages, and public distrust, the Greenberg-DeLauro example highlights a deeper rot. Nonprofits that should serve the public are instead serving power itself — reshaping reality, dictating narratives, and convincing voters that their frustrations are fringe. Meanwhile, insiders profit off both sides: the polling contracts, the campaign donations, the federal grants, and the public perception.
This isn’t just a Democratic problem — the same thing happens across the aisle — but in Connecticut, it’s an open secret that Rosa DeLauro’s political influence and Stanley Greenberg’s consulting empire have blurred together into something more powerful than voters realize.
When the people who tell you what to think are the same ones cashing the checks for telling it — democracy stops being democracy. It becomes a show.







Let's put a STOP to this once and for all. Elect Chris Lancia in CT's 3rd district. 30 + years of Rosa is just too much https://lanciaforcongress2026.org/