Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, Gettr, Truth Social, Twitter

In October 2020, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) removed the "Black Separatist" category from its Hate Map, reclassifying groups under specific ideologies like antisemitism and anti-LGBTQ rhetoric as part of its "Equity Through Accuracy" initiative.

By citing "valid anger" against systemic oppression, the SPLC aimed to focus on behaviors, not racial labels, but sparked debate over excusing hate.

This mirrored a Biden administration trend where similar justifications targeted dissenters—conservatives, radical feminists, independents like Elon Musk and Joe Rogan, and former Democrats pushed toward Republicans—normalizing hostility, anti-white sentiment, accusations of fascism, and violence like Tesla car burnings and the September 2025 assassination of Charlie Kirk.

The Change and Its Context

The SPLC's 2020 initiative, completed by 2021, argued the Black Separatist label conflated cultural advocacy with extremism.

Framing some rhetoric as "valid anger" from historical oppression sought to distinguish emotional responses from calls to violence, yet critics saw it softening scrutiny of antisemitic or anti-white rhetoric.

The Biden administration echoed this by framing opposition to progressive policies—on transgender rights, pronouns, or systemic racism—as bigotry, targeting not just conservatives but radical feminists and independents, alienating them from Democratic circles and pushing many toward Republican alignment.

Weaponizing 'Valid Anger'

This narrative justified attacks on diverse dissenters.

Moms for Liberty was labeled transphobic for opposing expansive Title IX and gender-affirming policies. Feminists, like J.K. Rowling, faced accusations for defending biological sex-based rights despite progressive roots. Policies prioritizing non-white communities in aid were defended as historical redress, framing white grievances as illegitimate and fueling anti-white sentiment. Violence escalated: Tesla cars and dealerships were vandalized or burned—often targeting owners for merely parking in lots—excused as righteous pushback against "capitalist" symbols, with X posts documenting such acts as "valid" responses to systemic issues.

The rhetoric peaked with the murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, during a Turning Point USA event at Utah Valley University, where suspect Tyler Robinson allegedly acted on perceived hate from Kirk's activism.

Online, some mocked the killing with jokes and memes, laughing off the tragedy as karmic justice for Kirk's views, further dehumanizing dissenters.

From Rhetoric to Violence

The SPLC's leniency set a precedent that Biden's rhetoric amplified, casting dissenters as fascists or bigots. This fueled rising political violence, with X posts noting harassment of feminists, conservatives, and Tesla owners, alongside polls showing 77% of Americans view it as a major concern.

Kirk's assassination exemplified the toll: radical feminists faced rally threats, while acts like Tesla burnings were dismissed as anti-elite protest. The double standard—validating marginalized anger while pathologizing dissent from feminists, moderates, or whites—alienated former Democrats and justified hostility, eroding trust.

Cultural Context

Post-2020, amid systemic racism debates, "valid anger" became a refrain. Biden tied policy disputes to racial justice, alienating dissenters and, per X users, "creating Republicans out of liberals."

Selective empathy risks radicalization, as seen in Tesla attacks and Kirk's murder framed as resistance, with some online glee amplifying the division.

Analysis

The SPLC's reclassification and Biden's rhetoric show how "valid anger" silences dissent, justifies anti-white sentiment, and excuses violence like Tesla vandalism or Kirk's assassination. By framing opposition as bigotry, it blurs critique and incitement, polarizing discourse.

Yet, hope endures: polls reveal 72% of Americans reject political violence outright, with 77% seeing it as a major problem and a vast majority eager to heal the nation from this insanity.

Progress demands distinguishing systemic reform from personal attacks with universal accountability.

Conclusion

The SPLC's erasure of Black Separatists and Biden's vilification of dissenters reveal how "valid anger" shields controversy while targeting conservatives, feminists, and independents—culminating in tragedies like Kirk's murder, met with cruel laughter. Acknowledging historical pain is crucial, but justifying hate, silencing skeptics, or excusing violence erodes moral clarity. With 77% of Americans opposing this madness and yearning for unity, there's real hope for the United States to reclaim fairness, nuance, and healing to combat extremism without creating new victims.

‘NO AD’ subscription for CDM!  Sign up here and support real investigative journalism and help save the republic!‘