• Federal Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction Prohibiting FBI, DOJ, DHS And Others From Working With Big Tech To Censor Social Media

    Public domain.

    Please Follow us on GabMindsTelegramRumbleGab TV, Gettr, Truth SocialTwitter

    Trump-appointed Federal Judge Terry A. Doughty issued a blow to the Biden Administration in an Independence Day ruling in the case of State of Missouri et. al., versus Joseph R. Biden Jr., et. al, which is about the federal government working with Big Tech in order to censor social media.

    The Request for Preliminary Injunction was granted in part and denied in part.

    The order states that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the National Institute of Allergy and Infections Diseases (NIAID), the Office of the Surgeon General, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the US Census Bureau, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the US Department of Justice, the White House Executive Office, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency ("CISA"), the US Department of State, along with dozens of named individuals, including Xavier Becerra (Secretary of HHS), Elvis Chan (who featured prominently in the Twitter files), Surgeon General Vivek H. Murthy, and White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, among others, are all RESTRAINED from taking the following actions related to social media companies:

    1. Meeting with social media companies to urge, encourage, pressure or induce the removal, deletion, suppression or reduction of content containing protected free speech;
    2. Encouraging, pressuring, or inducing social media companies to remove, delete, suppress, or reduce content containing protected free speech;
    3. Encouraging, pressuring, or inducing social media companies to change their guidelines for removing, deleting, suppressing, or reducing content containing protected free speech;
    4. Contacting social media companies in any way to remove, delete, suppress or reduce content pertaining to free speech;
    5. Collaborating, coordinating, partnering, switchboarding, and/or jointly working with the Election Integrity Partnership, the Virality Project, the Stanford Internet Observatory, or any like project or group in order to remove, delete, suppress, or reduce protected free speech;
    6. Threatening, pressuring, or coercing social media companies in any manner to remove, delete, suppress, or reduce protected free speech;
    7. Taking any action to remove, delete, suppress, or reduce posted content protected by the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution;
    8. Following up with social media companies to determine of protected free speech content was removed, deleted, suppressed, or reduced;
    9. Requesting content reports from social-media companies detailing actions taken to remove, delete, suppress, or reduce content containing protected free speech; and
    10. Notifying social media companies to "be on the lookout" for postings containing protected free speech.

    The Preliminary Injunction also detailed actions that are not prohibited, including contacting social media companies about criminal activity, national security threats, election threats (e.g., criminal efforts to suppress voting, provide illegal campaign contributions, attacks on election infrastructure or foreign attempts to influence elections), public safety threats, threats to voters (e.g., mislead on voting requirements and procedures), or to promote government policies or views on matters of public concern.

    Communicating with social media companies about deleting, removing, suppressing, or reducing posts on social-media platforms that are not protected free speech by the Free Speech Clause in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution is also permitted.

    This Preliminary Injunction will remain in place until the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit or the Supreme Court of the US offers a final resolution.

    Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey celebrated the win in a statement on Twitter.

    He said, "the federal government cannot be trusted to protect Americans' rights, which is precisely why our Founders enshrined the First Amendment into the Constitution."

    ‘NO AD’ subscription for CDM!  Sign up here and support real investigative journalism and help save the republic!

    SHARE THIS ARTICLE

    Off the press

    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest

    0 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
  • Copyright © 2024 The Connecticut Centinal
    magnifier