Legitimate Frustration Or Misguided Anger

Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, Gettr, Truth Social, Twitter

My Thanksgiving eve interview with Connecticut Republican Chair, Ben Proto was a lively, wide-ranging conversation — equal parts fire and reflection. Picture this: It's the day before the turkey trots out, and instead of basting recipes, we're basting the wounds from the 2025 municipal elections over pumpkin-spiced outrage. Proto defended the GOP’s relevance with the kind of unyielding conviction that makes you wonder if he's got a secret stash of Red Bull or just that natural Stratford swagger. He insisted there is life in Connecticut conservatism — "a pulse, Reese, not a flatline," he said, leaning into the mic like he was whispering sweet nothings to the Nutmeg State's dormant voters. And he argued the party can rebuild if it learns from mistakes, tossing out lines like, "We've got the blueprint; we just need to stop using crayons." Bold claim? Absolutely. But with the newly released 2025 municipal-election turnout data dropping like a post-holiday fruitcake, we finally have a better sense of where he may have a point — and where the cold reality still bites, harder than Aunt Edna's fruitcake, actually.

Let's talk turnout, because numbers don't lie, even if politicians occasionally try to sweet-talk them. This year’s statewide figure clocked in at about 36.4% — the highest participation rate in the last five municipal-election cycles in Connecticut. Roughly 820,700 of more than 2.2 million registered voters cast ballots. That’s something worth noting, especially after years of local elections that hovered near the low 30s, like a bad sequel nobody asked for. We're talking a genuine uptick, nearly 85,000 more souls showing up than in 2021. Credit where it's due: In the leafy River-town of Lyme, turnout soared to 66.1% — the highest in the state, because apparently, nothing says "democracy" like flannel and fall foliage. Other small or semi-rural towns weren’t far behind: Bridgewater hit 63.2%, Montville 61.8%, and Old Lyme 60.5%. These aren't just stats; they're small-town symphonies of civic engagement, the kind that make you think, "Maybe we can still pull this off without a U-Haul to Florida."

But — and here's where the Thanksgiving dinner conversation turns to politics — scrap a little of that statewide gloss, and the picture gets patchy fast, like a quilt made by a colorblind grandma. In Connecticut’s largest, densest cities, the numbers produced embarrassingly low turnouts that could make a sloth blush. In the state capital, Hartford, where only a school-board race was on the ballot, turnout sank to a miserable 6.6% — the lowest in the state, lower than my odds of resisting a second helping of pie. Cities such as Bridgeport (14.8%) and Waterbury (16.6%) also fell well below the average, turning what should be urban battlegrounds into ghost towns. In short: yes, 2025 saw a marginal improvement in overall turnout. But that improvement is almost entirely concentrated in small towns, rural communities, and certain suburban enclaves. In urban strongholds — where demographic weight and future growth lie — the GOP (and frankly, broad democracy) still squandered potential, like leaving the oven on preheat for a four-course meal.

Now, where Proto’s case holds water — and trust me, after that interview, I could feel the steam rising — starts with small-town and suburban strength. During our chat, he hammered home that the GOP remains viable, especially outside urban cores, arguing it's about "meeting people where their pickup trucks park, not where the Ubers idle." The turnout numbers in places like Lyme, Bridgewater, Montville, and Old Lyme substantiate that claim. Those kinds of results don’t come from bad strategy; they come from community engagement, local issues, arguably more personal politics — the stuff that gets folks voting before the coffee's even brewed. Moreover, that statewide nudge to 36.4% offers a ray of hope. For local elections, that’s not nothing; it shows at least some mobilization momentum. If harnessed correctly, that uptick could be a foundation for building a better-organized, more effective party base for future municipal or state-level contests. Proto's not wrong here — he's got that conservative fire, the kind that warms you up on a chilly New England night.

And let's not overlook the new early-voting infrastructure, which Proto called "a game-changer we finally got invited to." The 2025 municipal elections were the first with early in-person voting under Connecticut’s new law — and nearly 190,000 early ballots were counted, along with over 24,000 absentee ballots. That new flexibility is a strategic asset. If the GOP under Proto invests in get-out-the-vote efforts and leans into early/absentee ballots, that could mitigate historically low urban turnout. So yes, Proto has some credible wins. There are towns where Republicans and conservatives still command loyalty, where outreach works, and where voters show up when given reason to believe their vote matters. It's the kind of grounded optimism that makes you root for the underdog — or in this case, the guy with the tie that matches his tenacity.

Of course, no post-election autopsy is complete without the critics sharpening their scalpels, and boy, did they come out swinging online. Some in the GOP and conservative circles have pointed out — and rightly — that the party’s strength remains lopsided, like a seesaw with elephants on one end. When your small-town turnout looks healthy but your urban core is yawning or asleep at the switch, you simply cannot build a statewide majority. Hartford’s 6.6% turnout isn’t a “blip” — it’s a full stop, a neon sign screaming "Missed Opportunity." Critics have also highlighted what many of us sensed listening to Proto: a lack of comprehensive urban-outreach strategy. It’s not enough to mobilize the base in rural or suburban areas — if you want to be competitive long-term, you need to penetrate cities like Bridgeport, Hartford, Waterbury, New Haven, Stamford. The 2025 numbers show clearly that the GOP didn’t even come close, and while early-voting and absentee ballots were options this year, the turnout bump was still mostly among smaller towns. That suggests a failure to leverage the new infrastructure where it might have made the most difference. Fair? Absolutely. These aren't gripes from the peanut gallery; they're roadmaps drawn in red ink.

That said, some of the post-election heat directed at Proto feels overwrought, like blaming the weatherman for the nor'easter. I scrolled through X — formerly Twitter, for us old-school conservatives — and saw takes declaring the GOP “dead” in Connecticut, or blaming him personally for every single loss, as if he's the lone wizard who waved a wand and turned out the lights in Bridgeport. One post called for a "hostile takeover" of local town committees because "the failure of leadership has to be intentional" — dramatic much? How else does Ben Proto get appointed to run the RNC budget committee, it sneered. Look, Proto's re-elected chair for a third term back in June, despite the naysayers, because enough folks saw value in his steady hand. Losing cities — or failing to mobilize urban voters — isn’t solely on the party chair. Urban turnout is shaped by many factors: demographics, economic disenchantment, disengagement, local issues, messaging, long-term party investment. It’s rarely about one man at the top, unless that man's got a time machine. The revival in turnout (36.4%) and the strong results in small towns show the party isn’t dead. It’s bruised — uneven — but there’s a pulse. To equate that with “irrelevant,” or to frame Proto as personally responsible for every urban loss, ignores structural realities and lasting strengths. And some of the most scathing critiques demand unrealistic turnaround on tight timelines. Building grassroots networks in cities — registering voters, cultivating local leaders, building trust — doesn’t happen with a snap of the fingers. Criticizing for not winning big in 2025 when the groundwork wasn’t laid is a little like faulting a slow cooker for not cooking a meal in five minutes. Chill, keyboard warriors; we've got enough hot air in Hartford already.

If I were casting about for a 2026–2028 playbook — and honey, if Proto's taking notes, call me for coffee — here’s what I’d urge: Invest in sustained urban outreach. Not campaign-season parachute visits — real, long-term presence. Hire or support community organizers. Meet folks where they are. Talk education, public safety, cost of living, municipal services — not just abstract national-level rhetoric. Find issues that resonate on Main Street, not just on conservative talk radio. Make early voting and absentee outreach central, not peripheral. With early-voting infrastructure now in place, build programs to educate voters — especially in underperforming towns. Promote absentee registration, early voting drives, ballot-drop reminders. Build on small-town/suburban momentum — but scale it. Winning in rural and suburban towns isn’t what makes the GOP a statewide contender: winning and organizing everywhere does. Use the high-turnout communities as anchor points to trial outreach methods and then export best practices outward. Be honest about losses — and ready to study them. Don’t just chalk a defeat up to “blue wave” or “bad turnout.” Analyze where turnout fell, why, and how to fix it. Use data from 2025 (town by town) to guide 2026 candidate recruitment, outreach, and resource allocation. Proto's got the drive; now let's add some horsepower.

In the aftermath of the 2025 results, I’ve seen a fair amount of melodrama online: “The GOP is finished!” one comment screamed. Another questioned whether Proto even knows what state he’s running — as if he's been moonlighting in Rhode Island. Look — I get the frustration. Democrats picked up a lot of municipal seats this year. Many longtime Republicans fell. But to declare the entire party beyond hope is short-sighted, like tossing the turkey because the stuffing's lumpy. The turnout bump to 36.4% tells us something: there are voters in Connecticut who still care. The 66% in Lyme, the 63% in Bridgewater, the 60%-plus in Old Lyme — those aren’t just numbers, they’re hope. They show us what’s possible when people believe their vote matters. Dismissing that out of hand is not just unfair to Proto — it’s irresponsible if you care about future conservative wins. At the same time, it’s fair to call out the gaps: especially the nearly abandoned urban fields. If Republicans want a comeback, they can’t keep skipping over cities as if turnout there is optional.

If you ask me — and you did — what’s next for Connecticut conservatism: I’d say it’s not about more infighting, more hot takes, or shaming leadership. It’s about strategy, unity, and sustained effort. Proto isn’t a miracle worker — he’s a man with a big job, inheriting structural challenges that didn’t arise overnight. But there are real glimmers of success: small-town turnout, early-vote infrastructure, a modest statewide bump in voting. So here’s the pitch to fellow Connecticut conservatives: stop the back-biting. Enough of the keyboard warriors declaring us done before we’ve even tried. Instead, lean in. Volunteer. Organize. Build in Hartford, Bridgeport, Waterbury — but also in Lyme, Bridgewater, Montville, Old Lyme. Use the momentum where it exists. Build a coalition that doesn’t just rely on nostalgia. Work with Proto — hold him to account — but also stand beside him if you want to win. Because if we don’t band together now, those cities that slept at the polls this fall won’t just stay asleep — they’ll seal the outcome. And thanks to inertia, bad turnout, and exhaustion, next time might look even worse. But if Connecticut conservatives unite — south to north, urban to rural — maybe, just maybe, we make 2025 look like a dress rehearsal. And Ben? That fiery spark you brought to my studio? Let's fan it into a flame. The boss deserves a win — and so do we.

‘NO AD’ subscription for CDM!  Sign up here and support real investigative journalism and help save the republic!'