Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, Gettr, Truth Social, Twitter, YouTube

For years, Connecticut veterinarian Dr. John Robb was treated like a dangerous outlier for openly questioning standard vaccine protocols for pets.

State regulators accused Robb of violating rabies vaccination rules after he administered reduced vaccine doses to smaller dogs, arguing that one-size-fits-all dosing could be harmful to some animals. Connecticut eventually sanctioned him and barred him from administering rabies vaccines after a long legal fight that turned him into a lightning rod in the vaccine debate.

But now, with Connecticut lawmakers advancing new legislation expanding vaccine authority for adults and institutions, many residents are suddenly looking back at what Robb was trying to warn people about years ago.

“I saw pets die, become injured, and many times they already had immunity,” Robb said during an interview with Her Truth Unleashed. “What I see happening in pets, I’m sure is happening in the human field as well.”

Robb says his fight was never about opposing every vaccine. He argues the real issue is blind repetition without individualized evaluation.

“Vaccines can be beneficial in some circumstances,” Robb said, specifically mentioning rabies and distemper/parvo vaccines. “However, once immunity has been achieved — easily verified by checking antibody titers — there’s no benefit to further vaccination.”

That argument helped spark one of the biggest veterinary controversies Connecticut has seen in years because rabies vaccination laws are strictly regulated. State officials argued veterinarians are required to follow approved vaccine standards exactly as written. Robb argued smaller animals could react differently to standardized doses and that antibody testing should matter more than automatic revaccination schedules.

Now the debate is colliding head-first with Connecticut’s new vaccine legislation, House Bill 5044, officially titled An Act Establishing Connecticut Vaccine Standards.

Supporters of the bill argue Connecticut is trying to protect vaccine access and maintain state-level authority if federal standards shift in the future. Critics see something very different.

A lot of Connecticut residents are furious over the bill and feel lawmakers learned absolutely nothing from the COVID years. Opponents say the legislation gives too much authority to unelected public health officials while creating a framework many fear could eventually support broader adult vaccine mandates tied to workplaces, hospitals, schools, or other institutions.

For many people, the anger goes beyond vaccines themselves. The deeper issue is the feeling that bodily autonomy, informed consent, and concerns about side effects are immediately dismissed whenever people question government policy.

“No government authority should be able to force someone to inject something into their body that could have deleterious effects,” Robb said during the interview. “It is a person’s individual right to decide what is injected into their body — not the State of Connecticut.”

Robb also discussed antibody titer testing, which measures existing immunity levels instead of automatically repeating vaccinations. He pointed to his own son, who was tested for MMR immunity while pursuing paramedic training.

“They checked his MMR titer and he was good,” Robb said. “He didn’t need the vaccine.”

Mainstream medical organizations continue supporting standardized vaccine schedules as necessary for public health. But what started as a fight over pets has now become part of a much larger Connecticut argument over medical freedom, government authority, public trust, and whether questioning official policy automatically makes someone dangerous.

For years, many people laughed off Dr. John Robb as “just a veterinarian.”

Now, with Connecticut expanding vaccine authority into the adult space, a growing number of residents are starting to ask whether the state should have listened more carefully the first time.

‘NO AD’ subscription for CDM!  Sign up here and support real investigative journalism and help save the republic!'