Work Over Welfare

Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, Gettr, Truth Social, Twitter

Here we are in the glittering year of 2025, staring down the barrel of a government shutdown that’s left millions of SNAP recipients—that’s food stamps, for the uninitiated—high and dry without their monthly grocery lifeline. And what’s the response bubbling up from the depths of social media? Not a collective sigh and a pivot to problem-solving. Oh no. Instead, we’ve got a chorus of folks threatening to turn grocery stores into their personal smash-and-grab wonderlands.

“If I don’t get my EBT, I’m looting Walmart!” they cry—channeling their inner Mad Max over a delayed deposit. Because nothing says “feeding my babies” quite like risking a felony charge and a night in the clink, right? It’s almost poetic—desperation meets delinquency in 280 characters or less.

Let’s be real: these online warriors are expending more energy typing out their looting manifestos than they are scrolling through Indeed for a job listing. Fingers flying across screens, hashtags like **#NoStampsNoPeace** trending, all while the same hands could be filling out applications or learning a trade on YouTube. It’s like they’ve got a PhD in procrastination and a minor in misplaced priorities. “Babies gotta eat!” they proclaim. And sure—that’s fair. Nobody’s arguing against that. But last I checked, babies also need parents who model something beyond “when life gives you lemons, steal the lemonade stand.”

If you’re healthy enough to haul a shopping cart full of pilfered Pop-Tarts through a shattered window, you’re probably spry enough to stock shelves or flip burgers for an honest wage. But hey—why sweat for $15 an hour when you can play Robin Hood with a side of riot gear? It’s the American dream, remixed for the entitlement era.

Now, before you brand me as some heartless Scrooge sipping champagne from a bootstraps mug, let’s pump the brakes. I get it—life’s not a level playing field. There are folks out there who genuinely can’t punch a clock due to mental illness or severe disabilities. Depression that chains you to the bed, anxiety that turns a job interview into a panic-fueled nightmare, or physical limitations that make even basic tasks Herculean. For them, SNAP isn’t a crutch—it’s a lifeline. We should be compassionate, supportive, and yes, generous with taxpayer dollars to ensure they don’t starve while society figures out better ways to integrate them.

Nobody’s suggesting we yeet the safety net into the abyss. But compassion doesn’t mean coddling—and it sure as hell doesn’t mean ignoring the elephant in the room, or should I say, the elephant-sized crowd gaming the system like it’s a glitchy video game.

Speaking of which—let’s take a stroll down memory lane. During the Obama years, the federal government didn’t just maintain SNAP; it supercharged it. The administration actively pushed states—especially California, Texas, and Florida, the three largest—to expand enrollment. Outreach campaigns encouraged schools, hospitals, and even community groups to sign people up, whether they asked for it or not. By the time President Obama left office, nearly 43 million Americans were on SNAP, an increase of more than 10 million people since he took over. At the program’s 2012 peak, almost 48 million were receiving benefits—roughly one in seven Americans.

What began as emergency relief during the Great Recession quietly evolved into a culture of permanent dependency. Instead of helping people climb out of hardship, it normalized staying in it. When government hands you a steady stream of benefits with no clear off-ramp, the incentive to hustle fades fast. And when the state starts measuring compassion by how many people it enrolls rather than how many it lifts off the rolls, you’ve got a recipe for generational dependency—something even FDR warned against.

And that’s the rub: for too many, SNAP has morphed from temporary aid into a lifestyle choice—with its own health hazards. We’re talking folks who treat their EBT cards like golden tickets to the junk food carnival, loading up on sugary sodas, processed snacks, and enough sodium to pickle a small cow. The result? A fast track to diabetes, high blood pressure, and obesity that makes shutdown delays look like a minor inconvenience. Studies have shown that adult SNAP participants tend to have higher rates of obesity and diet-related illnesses than their low-income peers not in the program. The irony is rich: the program meant to feed America has, in many cases, just made it sicker.

Now let’s be clear—poverty doesn’t automatically mean laziness. In fact, the truly indigent are often the hardest workers you’ll ever meet. Poverty can forge a fire in the belly like nothing else. History is full of rags-to-riches stories that make these looting threats look like child’s play. Chris Gardner, the man behind *The Pursuit of Happyness*, went from homeless to Wall Street success without looting a grocery store. Oprah Winfrey, born into poverty in rural Mississippi, didn’t wait for a handout—she built a media empire. J.K. Rowling, on welfare in the UK, wrote *Harry Potter* in a café and became a billionaire. These people didn’t wait for “the system” to save them; they got up, got to work, and built something out of nothing.

Contrast that with today’s social-media mob, where “desperate need” translates to “entitled outrage.” They’re not indigent in the motivational sense; they’re stagnant—mistaking government cheese for a career path. Meanwhile, retailers are boarding up stores like it’s zombie apocalypse prep. The threats alone erode public trust and paint all SNAP users with the same brush of belligerence. It’s humorous in that dark, tragicomic way—like a bad sitcom where everyone forgets that jobs exist.

So what’s the fix? Maybe it’s time to rethink SNAP not as a perpetual handout but as a trampoline—bouncy enough to launch folks back into self-sufficiency. Tie benefits to job training, health education, or community service. Reward the motivated, support the truly needy, and call out the gamers. Because at the end of the day, feeding babies isn’t about looting—it’s about legacy. Teach them to fish, not to filch. And if that sounds preachy, well, tough cookies—preferably the kind you bought with your own paycheck.

In this shutdown saga, the real tragedy isn’t delayed stamps—it’s the squandered potential. We’ve got a nation of Carnegies and Oprahs waiting to emerge, but too many are too busy tweeting tantrums to notice. Laugh if you must—but let’s hope the humor hits home before the hammers hit the windows. Because in the grand buffet of life, nobody wins when the main course is chaos.

‘NO AD’ subscription for CDM!  Sign up here and support real investigative journalism and help save the republic!'