Est. 1802 ·

There's No Need For A Fight

By Reese On The Radio
February 15, 2026
2

But Coronations Don't Help!

Please Follow us on GabMindsTelegramRumble, Gettr, Truth SocialTwitterYouTube

The recent internal poll released by Erin Stewart’s campaign for the 2026 Republican gubernatorial nomination has sparked considerable chatter in Connecticut political circles. Conducted by OnMessage Inc. and showing Stewart with a solid 39% among likely primary voters—compared to 16% for State Sen. Ryan Fazio, 9% for Betsy McCaughey, and a hefty 34% undecided—this survey positions the former New Britain mayor as the clear frontrunner in a three-way race. It’s the kind of number that makes campaigns sit up straight: a double-digit lead over her nearest declared rival, with a third of the electorate still up for grabs.

On the surface, this looks like a green light for Stewart to play it safe. With the WTIC NewsTalk 1080 Republican debate set for late April, why risk the stage? Debates are unpredictable arenas where a slip-up can erase polling advantages overnight. A commanding lead tempts any candidate to treat the event as optional theater—let the underdogs scrap while the front-runner conserves energy, funds, and exposure for the general election grind against Ned Lamont or whoever the Democrats nominate. Stewart could skip it, cite scheduling or focus on grassroots efforts, and still maintain momentum. It’s a classic frontrunner move: protect the lead, avoid gaffes, and let the numbers speak.

But here’s where the brilliance of this poll release turns into a potential self-inflicted wound. The Fazio camp didn’t mince words, branding it a “fake” push poll designed to deceive voters rather than inform them. Accusations like that aren’t new for internal surveys—campaigns often craft questions to nudge respondents toward favorable results—but the timing and tone here sting especially hard. Stewart’s team touts the data as proof she’s “best positioned to win and fix Connecticut,” yet skeptics see arrogance: a premature coronation that assumes the nomination is already in the bag.

This is the real danger. Connecticut Republican primary voters aren’t in the mood for top-down decrees. After years of establishment figures managing decline—high taxes, failing schools, crime concerns, and a state that feels like it’s bleeding residents—many GOP voters crave authenticity and a fight. They want candidates who earn the nod through debate, door-knocking, and direct confrontation, not one who waves a self-commissioned poll like a scepter and declares the race over before most voters have even tuned in. Releasing this now, months before the August primary, risks coming across as the very insider maneuvering that has alienated conservatives for too long: the party brass (or in this case, a well-funded campaign) deciding who’s “viable” while sidelining the grassroots voice.

Voters feel this viscerally. When a candidate pushes “the polls have spoken,” it echoes the same condescension they’ve heard from Hartford elites for years—the idea that outcomes are preordained, that their ballot is just a formality. It tilts the field, making the process feel rigged rather than representative. In a party still energized by outsider energy and frustration with status-quo Republicans who talk tough but deliver little, this strategy can backfire spectacularly. Undecideds (that 34%) aren’t looking for inevitability; they’re looking for conviction, contrast, and a reason to show up. Alienating them by appearing arrogant could send them straight to Fazio’s “Connecticut First” messaging or even McCaughey’s national-conservative flair.

We need party unity, but unity forged in the crucible of competition, not imposed by early score-settling. Skipping the WTIC debate might preserve short-term optics, but it cedes the moral high ground. Debates aren’t just about zingers; they’re about accountability. Let Stewart defend her record as mayor—balancing budgets, tackling blight—against Fazio’s legislative experience and McCaughey’s outsider perspective. Let voters see who handles pressure, who articulates a vision for lower taxes, safer streets, and economic revival without apology. That’s how you build real enthusiasm, not manufactured inevitability.

This race isn’t about egos or legacies. We’ve endured two terms of a governor who often seemed more focused on his own brand than on serving everyday Nutmeggers—ballooning costs, deferred infrastructure, policies that prioritize optics over results. Republicans have a chance to offer something different: leadership that puts people first. But that starts with respecting the process. Claiming unearned victories risks turning off the very voters who want to reclaim the state from one-party rule.

The power belongs to the people Stewart, Fazio, and McCaughey aspire to serve—not to any single campaign’s internal metrics. Let the primary play out fully. Engage, debate, persuade. Earn the nomination the old-fashioned way, through the will of the voters. Anything less sells short the conservative principles of self-reliance, competition, and grassroots empowerment that Connecticut Republicans desperately need right now.

In the end, a true leader doesn’t hide behind favorable numbers; they step into the arena and fight for every vote. That’s the path to not just winning a primary, but rebuilding trust in a party that can finally deliver for this state. Connecticut deserves that fight—not a coronation.

‘NO AD’ subscription for CDM!  Sign up here and support real investigative journalism and help save the republic!'

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael Satagaj

...many GOP voters crave authenticity and a fight. They want candidates who earn the nod through debate, door-knocking, and direct confrontation...

Hmmm, what 1A infringement shall we roll back first?
Hmmm, what 2A infringement shall we roll back first?
Hmmm, what welfare program shall we eliminate first?
Hmmm, what climate change policy shall we cut first?
Hmmm, what sanctuary city shall we challenge first?
Hmmm, …

You mean confrontation like that? CT Republicans?
I don't think so.

Maggie Neri

It's amazing to me, with high gas taxes, high home heating oil prices, public benefits charges on Eversource bills, income taxes, an absurd real estate market, all the social welfare and sanctuary issues, and a would-be monarch in Hartford, that the Republican slate of candidates seems so apathetic to our trajectory in this highly partisan state. Good grief..get out there and be seen, be heard!! We need things to get better!!

FOLLOW US

  • magnifiercrossmenu