Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, Gettr, Truth Social, Twitter, YouTube

Connecticut is being sued along with Arizona as the states that have yet to release their voter rolls on request from the Federal Department of Justice.

Recently introduced Senate Bill 226: An Act Concerning Various Revisions Related to Election Processes includes an attempt to undermine the DOJ's request:

Section (16): exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act all ballots cast at elections, primaries and referenda, and (17) for voter registration information, (A) limit disclosure of birth date information to just the year, and (B) limit use of such information to election-related, scholarly, journalistic, political or governmental purposes.

The Connecticut Freedom of Information Commission opposes SB 226:

The Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information also opposes SB 226:

Is this FREEDOM in the “constitution state” of Connecticut? I think not. I think we are represented by folks that are attempting to control and oppress freedom. I believe they are holding on to their illegally obtained power by a thread. The leaders of this state refuse access to voter rolls requested legally by every means of illegal protest regarding the requirement that they do so under FOIA rules.

How can we be assured our individual rights are not being violated as voters in Connecticut? The answer is clearly that we can’t, do to the leaders that control these records not being held accountable to the very essence of each individual’s right to the value of their sacred right of a vote, and having that vote counted and not compromised by illegally cast votes that delude it’s value.

How does Connecticut’s Secretary of State answer FOIA requests from citizens? Does it answer them in the same manner? Does it ignore them with bureaucratic responses citing unrealistic amounts of time to provide or cite exorbitant amounts in “administrative costs” in order to provide such records that the law states and requires compliance to do so?

In my ongoing research, I cite the following examples:

Instead of compliance, Connecticut one party control attempts to create laws for why it can’t follow the law and comply:

How is this legal? How does such an outright condemnation of law by making another law to ignore it stay viable without challenge in court? Because it takes money to challenge dictatorship control over we the people. We the people are not considered to be constitutionally protected by law under the tyrants who rule Connecticut. These leaders are all about keeping their power over you and me and demonstrate this by their actions to keep their control over what laws they wish to let you think you have and what laws they retain to keep their own power over you in place. This type of leadership is unconstitutional and unacceptable.

In order to fight back at this, you would need to “vote” out their tyranny, of which they attempt to behave in an “unaccountable” fashion to hide your inability to do so because there is obvious “fraud” in the voter rolls which keeps them in power, and takes your legal redress at the ballot box away from you.

This is illegal, unconstitutional and challenges every precept of the basis of this country and state’s founding. We are being governed in the same fashion as communist countries that have organized their structure to maintain control over governance in order to quell any legal right of the people in their attempt to overturn their governance. This is how empires/countries fall from existence. States like Connecticut are leading the overturning of the United States of America. It is imperative that we the people of Connecticut recognize the serious nature of our time and the potential end of a time of civilized existence.

We have been suppressed and our rights illegally denied and infiltrated by traitors. Continuing to quietly deny this truth leads only to our final demise, not just here in this state, but to the overall demise of this nation.

We see this everywhere in our divided nation of distraction, where major news media is owned and distributed by cohorts of the powerful traitors that are relentlessly holding on to their power over us as we the people. The other fact to understand here is that our numbers even as victims far surpass theirs. We cannot fall unless we concede to accept doing so without the attempt of revolt. A revolt that even I suggest would not be easy, and may not be possible to be victorious in without breaching the peace of our civil society, which I do not advocate as a first choice, but may entertain as a path of last resort.

FOIA, the Freedom of Information Act, if not taken seriously means nothing as a matter of law. Adjudicating whether one holds the right of their vote to challenge who is in control, not just as one but as the whole of those with the “right” is a matter that must be adjudicated and it’s right protected via a judicial system that we have to put to the ultimate test.

I would advise all of the whole of the legally voting public to FLOOD the system in CT with rightful FOIA requests to release the voter rolls expeditiously for review and audit. Any citizen presenting merit in their request has the RIGHT to inspect the voter registry and should do so and should not depend on the Department of Justice only to fight this fight. See CT law pertaining to this right here.

Here is an example of how to make a FOIA request and then publish it as public interest:

To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to the Connecticut Freedom of Information Act, I hereby request the following records:

1. Any and all memoranda of understanding (MOUs), agreements, contracts, or similar instruments between the state and the U.S. Department of Justice relating to the provision of voter registration data, voter files, or voter roll information, from January 20, 2025 to the present.

2. Any draft, unsigned, proposed, or rejected versions of such agreements.

3. Any amendments, addenda, or modifications to such agreements.

This request includes but is not limited to any document described or labeled as a "memorandum of understanding" or contract relating to voter data, voter list maintenance, or voter roll verification.

If any records are withheld in whole or in part, please identify the specific statutory exemption relied upon for each withholding.

I also request that, if possible and pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-212(d), fees be waived as I believe this request is in the public interest and not made for commercial gain. The requested documents will be made available to the public at (here you put an an example of a public posting site it will be published at, for example MuckRock.com or an independent news publication etc.).

In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 4 business days, as the statute requires.

Let’s see if we have rights? Let’s see what Connecticut is trying so hard to HIDE!

‘NO AD’ subscription for CDM!  Sign up here and support real investigative journalism and help save the republic!'