Est. 1802 ·

Congressman Jim Himes Says "Who Is Going To Die" As A Result Of Exposing Obama's Alleged Role In "Treasonous Conspiracy"

By Greenwich Patriots
July 24, 2025
1
Screenshot, Congressman Jim Himes on Facebook

Please Follow us on GabMindsTelegramRumble, Gettr, Truth SocialTwitter

"My only question is when people like Tulsi Gabbard and Donald Trump accuse an ex-President of a capital crime that is punishable by death, who is going to die? Who is going to die because they decided that they needed a distraction away from the Epstein calamity which they brought upon themselves," said US Congressman Jim Himes on MSNBC's Deadline | White House.

Then the host, Nicole Wallace, told Himes to "say more" about his "prediction that someone will die."

"Well, again, when you use language like treason, I mean go into my social media feeds because I’ve been trying to tell the truth about this ever since Tulsi put out this staggeringly disprovable and instantly disprovable lie when you start using the kind of language the language of treason and of somebody being a traitor, you know, some tiny percentage of the population is just crazy enough to decide that they need to do something about it," claimed Himes. "And again, it’s what happened where I am standing right now on January 6th, 2021. The statements of a president have some power.”

We don't know about you, but that sounded like a threat to us.

Kinda like when Chuck Schumer warned Trump in 2017 that the "intelligence community" had "six ways from Sunday" of getting back at him for daring to call the Russia collusion story a hoax -- even though that's exactly what it was, and Tulsi Gabbard just released the evidence to prove it.

If you haven't seen yesterday's press release yet, it says, in part:

"There is irrefutable evidence detailing how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an Intelligence Community Assessment that they knew was false, promoting the contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump win, as though it were true. The documents we released show how they did it: manufacturing findings from shoddy sources, suppressing evidence that disproved their false claims, disobeying IC tradecraft standards, and withholding the truth from the American people...

You can find the full investigation and referral report here.

Also, for what it's worth, we've lived through enough deep state psy-ops by this point to recognize that if there was anything at all damning about Trump's involvement with Jeffrey Epstein, we would have known about it by now.

We're not saying we don't want to see the truth come out about Epstein -- that would be great -- but they had control of the White House and the "autopen" for the last four years, and decided to do absolutely nothing at all about Epstein until the deep state needed to deflect from the bombshell allegations that Barrack Obama was the "leader" behind a treasonous conspiracy, a years-long coup against Donald Trump and his Administration.

Of course Himes, who was on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence in 2017 and is now the Ranking Member, called the accusations "baseless."

He later defended the "Intelligence Community Assessment's conclusion that Putin favored Donald Trump" despite the newly-released evidence to the contrary.

Himes also arrogantly promised that no one would EVER prosecute President Obama "because there is not a court in the United States that will do anything than utterly laugh these contentions out of court."

Then he promoted a thread on X in which he said he's "hesitant to dignify desperate attempts to distract from the Epstein scandal with a response" but had no other choice than to offer his own "desperate attempts to distract" from Gabbard's accusation that Obama was a traitor.

Himes alleged that Gabbard was "trying to rewrite history, casting doubt" on the IC conclusion that Putin supported Trump not Hillary, and once again laughed at the idea that any court would charge the actors allegedly tied to the treasonous conspiracy for any crimes.

Gabbard asserted the evidence was "irrefutable" in a fiery press conference with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt yesterday.

Speaking of the evidence, we wanted to mention that Catherine Herridge has been doing an excellent job of pouring through the newly declassified documents released by Gabbard and highlighting important findings.

Meanwhile, Himes is apparently on his way back to Greenwich.

"Never thought I’d say this, but Jeffrey Epstein is the reason I'm heading back to Connecticut today. Rather than addressing everyday Americans’ issues, Speaker Johnson shutdown Congress to prevent Republicans from having to vote on releasing the files. Our country deserves better," wrote Himes on Facebook.

There he goes again, pivoting to Epstein to distract from rather serious, and legitimate allegations of a "treasonous conspiracy."

Why so much panic, Jim? Got something to be worried about?

‘NO AD’ subscription for CDM!  Sign up here and support real investigative journalism and help save the republic!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bob MacGuffie

Ha - Jimbo is the last Stooge that Hakeem Jeffries has in reserve to peddle his lard. Himes put out a 7-part Tweet gaslighting about the DNI release. That's a ton of splaining to attempt in the face of a dam-burst of revelations. Himes stood behind Adam Schiff as he stone-faced lied to the public for six years. Himes' interviews always look like hostage-videos... b/c they are - he's hostage to a dying corrupt Democrat regime........ as he knows only too well.............

FOLLOW US

  • magnifiercrossmenu