Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, Gettr, Truth Social, Twitter
Yesterday, New York Times reporters Maria Abi-Habib and Simon Romero wrote that by designating unspeakably vicious Mexican drug cartels as terrorists, the Trump administration might be hurting the US economy.
Never mind American citizens--think about the economy! Forget fentanyl, child- and sex-trafficking, murder, and drug operations on American soil--how is this going to affect our bottom line?
Is everyone over at the New York Times on drugs? pic.twitter.com/s2M3XtI0m9
— Rep. Nancy Mace (@RepNancyMace) January 23, 2025
Outspoken Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), among many others, was quick to call out the lampoonish headline. In countless articles, the Times has sought to denigrate whatever Trump has attempted to accomplish.
Infamously, under the leadership of Editor in Chief Dean Baquet, the newsroom was revealed to be venemously anti-Trump. We expected as much from CNN, who Project Veritas exposed in late 2020 to be anti-Trump at all times at the express direction of Jeff Zucker. Perhaps we were foolish to think the Times had changed with, well, the times.
Lo lamento!
It took deportation to make the Times see the light on the question of when a fetus is considered a human being.
The Trump administration wants to end "birthright citizenship", the globally uncommon idea that by being born on foreign soil, one gains citizenship to that country. The generous loophole in US policy has led to a rash of birth tourism, especially, and conspicuously by Chinese nationals, leading many conservatives to warn of espionage.
New York Times when peddling abortions:
— 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 (@mrddmia) January 23, 2025
“Fetus”
New York Times when peddling illegal immigration:
“Unborn Child” pic.twitter.com/gIAiwv7N2Y
Regardless, the Times is now in an unfamiliar position: opining that the unborn child who would have become an American citizen at birth, has rights. Oh, to be a fly on the wall in the newsroom of that once-great paper.
