Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, Gettr, Truth Social, Twitter

A number of social media posts made by Dr. Laura Haynes, a left-wing professor who studies how aging affects immunity at UConn Health, are causing a stir.

Haynes said she started the "year off right" when she posted, "F*CK TRUMP And Happy New Year."

She previously shared advice suggesting it was a "vital social tool" to cut Trump supporters out of your life: "shaming and shunning have long been ways that a civilization makes clear what we consider acceptable and unacceptable behavior."

She's made it clear she "absof*ckinglutely" hates Trump, and all of his supporters, especially Elon Musk--the only immigrant she wants to see deported.

And while we're on the topic, she thinks uneducated voters are more dangerous than illegal immigrants.

Can you imagine what it must feel like to be a Trump supporter in her class?

"I’m way past caring if people think I’m rude, especially if they voted for a f*cking narcissistic racist clown," said Haynes in yet another f-bomb laced tirade.

It's obvious she doesn't care if people think she's rude, especially considering how she celebrated the monopoly money found in the backpack of the UnitedHealthcare CEO shooter.

Another thing Haynes "absof*ckinglutely" hates?

Trump's cabinet picks, like Linda McMahon, whom Haynes called, "a f*cking nutjob who should be nowhere near a cabinet position."

She further believes "we are all f*cked" because Trump nominated Bobby Kennedy to lead HHS and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya to reform the NIH.

It's probably worth mentioning that Haynes is an NIH-funded scientist who thinks Dr. Fauci is a "national treasure." It's no surprise she's a HUGE fan of covid vaccines.

In fact, she's still pushing booster shots, covid tests, and mask-wearing, even if you got a booster shot.

"As a scientist who does NIH funded research, I am so f*cking over the “do your own research” bullsh*t from people who have no idea what they’re talking about," said Haynes.

She still seems to think using ivermectin to treat covid was just a conspiracy theory, despite the findings in the final report from The Select Subcommittee On The Coronavirus Pandemic.

The final report also determined the lab leak was not a conspiracy theory.

But when Republican Congressman Pete Sessions called for prosecuting those responsible for silencing the covid lab leak theory, Haynes responded by asking, "what the f*ck is wrong with Republicans? Who even thinks like this (outside of Russia)?"

Haynes was appalled when Trump said RFK Jr. would be investigating the link between autism and vaccines.

"You have to be f*cking kidding me…this will be a colossal waste of time & money," she argued.

Haynes said vaccines don't cause autism, but we found evidence to the contrary in the NIH PubMed Database, evidence which certainly seems to support the need for an investigation.

• Hypothesis: conjugate vaccines may predispose children to autism spectrum disorders
• The potential importance of steroids in the treatment of autistic spectrum disorders and other disorders involving mercury toxicity
• Reduced levels of mercury in first baby haircuts of autistic children
• Cultured lymphocytes from autistic children and non-autistic siblings up-regulate heat shock protein RNA in response to thimerosal challenge
• A possible central mechanism in autism spectrum disorders, part 1
• The role of mercury in the pathogenesis of autism
• Transcriptomic analyses of neurotoxic effects in mouse brain after intermittent neonatal administration of thimerosal
• Elevated levels of measles antibodies in children with autism
• What is regressive autism and why does it occur? Is it the consequence of multi-systemic dysfunction affecting the elimination of heavy metals and the ability to regulate neural temperature?

Did she miss these articles when she was doing her own research?

By the way, we read UConn's policy on personal social media posts made by University employees, and noticed that Haynes is perhaps in violation of a few items here.

For instance, UConn best practices include adding a disclaimer to personal social media accounts to acknowledge that statements represent personal views only, and not those of the university.

We couldn't find personal disclaimers on Haynes' social media accounts.

UConn does not authorize the use of University logos on employees' personal social media accounts, yet Haynes is clearly using University marks on her X account.

Did she get approval for this?

Additionally, UConn says, "When communicating on social media, it is important to act in a manner that is consistent with applicable University policies," which include an ethics statement.

The ethics statement talks about the University's core values, including knowledge, honesty, integrity, respect and professionalism. It says UConn "values an environment that is free from harassment, intimidation, bullying, incivility, disrespect and violence."

Are all of Haynes' posts really in alignment within this policy?

Is it possible for her to remain unbiased in the classroom?

And in all seriousness, does she get paid for using the f-word?

Because if we got a quarter for every time she dropped an f-bomb on social media…

‘NO AD’ subscription for CDM!  Sign up here and support real investigative journalism and help save the republic!‘