Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, Gettr, Truth Social, Twitter
The Greenwich Voting Moms recently rolled out recommendations for municipal elections, including for the Representative Town Meeting (RTM).
The Voting Moms called the recommendations “nonpartisan” and “balanced.”
The truth, however, is much different.
According to an analysis by Republicans in Greenwich District 8, the Voting Moms "overwhelmingly favored Democratic candidates over Republican ones."
"Of the 49 RTM candidates excluded from their so-called bipartisan list, 42 were Republicans, only 3 were Democrats, and 4 were unaffiliated. That is not balance — it is selective endorsement presented as neutrality," wrote the D8 Republicans. "“Bipartisan” is an appealing word, but it loses its meaning when used to mask bias. Voters deserve to know when a process claiming fairness in fact shuts out a wide range of voices."
"This issue is not about party loyalty — it’s about honesty," said the D8 Republicans. "Many RTM candidates report never being contacted by the group, including first-time candidates with no voting record to review. If the process is as open and thorough as advertised, how were these decisions made — and by whom?"
This is not the first time that we've heard this complaint about the Voting Moms.
The "Moms" are effectively a front group for Democrats: they endorsed Kamala, they call conservatives who don't want pornography in school libraries "book banners", and think that MAGA patriots are "extremists."
The Voting Moms' 2023 RTM endorsement list included a bunch of Indivisible members -- the same Indivisible members who have been supporting, at least on a local level, the on-going color revolution against the Trump Administration, leading protest after protest after protest after protest in town.
The point of these protests, which we learned from generous Indivisible-donor Senator Chris Murphy in his wild interview with Anand Giridharadas yesterday, is to "show power" and "stand in the way of dissent towards totalitarianism"... and eventually pave the way for full-blown socialism.
The Voting Moms 2025 recommended list still includes Indivisible member Sheila Phelan, along with people we've seen at Indivisible protests this year, like Stephen Meskers, Janet Stone McGuigan, Hector Arzeno -- and also former World Economic Forum globalist and ZuckBucks pusher, Scott Kalb.
If you want further evidence of the Voting Moms' bias, look at the recommendations for District 10 which has 19 candidates running for 19 seats. Yet for some reason, the allegedly "nonpartisan" and "balanced" Voting Moms picked only 5 candidates for D10, excluding 12 of 17 Republicans running in that district.
Need more evidence of the bias?
The same list was shared by the Greenwich Democrats and Trump-hating "republican" James Waters.
"When a group claims to unite the community while systematically favoring one side, it undermines trust in local democracy," said the D8 Republicans who shared a list of all candidates running for RTM by political affiliation. "And that leads to a deeper question: if a group is willing to mislead voters to appear balanced, how much trust should we place in their judgment — or their motives?"
Stay updated with the latest in the Constitution State with The CT Centinal
